![CTG classification criteria, interpretation and recommended management... | Download Scientific Diagram CTG classification criteria, interpretation and recommended management... | Download Scientific Diagram](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349286837/figure/tbl2/AS:990780533522433@1613231895324/CTG-classification-criteria-interpretation-and-recommended-management-according-to-FIGO.png)
CTG classification criteria, interpretation and recommended management... | Download Scientific Diagram
![FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography - Ayres‐de‐Campos - 2015 - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Wiley Online Library FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography - Ayres‐de‐Campos - 2015 - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Wiley Online Library](https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/e8939501-ede8-4b13-883f-8b15cb24a086/ijgo13-fig-0002-m.jpg)
FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography - Ayres‐de‐Campos - 2015 - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Wiley Online Library
![Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome](https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/images/GJORM.MS.ID.555737.G003.png)
Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome
![Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/table-3.jpg)
Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical
![Interobserver agreement and reliability in intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation, using the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines | Semantic Scholar Interobserver agreement and reliability in intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation, using the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/68d1d5c01b470191370cd1e5e94339b4d43b57b1/3-Table1-1.png)
Interobserver agreement and reliability in intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation, using the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines | Semantic Scholar
![Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/table-4.jpg)
Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical
![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-4.jpg)
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical
![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-3.jpg)
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical
![Time to reconsider: Have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla? - Olofsson - 2021 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library Time to reconsider: Have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla? - Olofsson - 2021 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library](https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/a4038b32-ee3d-4a6c-9283-9fa9dbee71cb/aogs14201-fig-0001-m.jpg)
Time to reconsider: Have the 2015 FIGO and 2017 Swedish intrapartum cardiotocogram classifications led us from Charybdis to Scylla? - Olofsson - 2021 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica - Wiley Online Library
![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-2.jpg)